Background and Aim: Numerous researches on ta'zir punishments have been conducted so far, but the issue of ta'zir in addition to diyat has been largely neglected. In the present article, made to address the importance of the punishment of ta'zir in addition to diyat, especially in medical crimes, and what is the basis of such punishments, an attempt has been. Method: The mentioned article is descriptive-analytical and the mentioned subject using the library method has been studied. Ethical Considerations: In all stages of writing the present study, the originality of the text and fidelity have been observed. Results: The findings indicate that according to the rule of al-Ta'zir, the Islamic ruler ta'zir punishments for forbidden matters can impose. In this regard, in some cases, some medical crimes, the legislature has imposed a penalty in addition to the ransom includes. Conclusion: The results of the study indicate that the punishment of ta'zir in addition to diyat in crimes, especially medical crimes, on the interests of society and public order is based. Public interest and order require that legislation in some Intentional and unIntentional crimes that have a public aspect or are related to the public interest, in addition to the ransom, the punishment of ta'zir such as imprisonment be determined.

Intentional replantation has been suggested as an acceptable replacement to conventional endodontic procedure when either conventional or surgical endodontic treatment could not help in treatment of the lesion.During the past few decades controvercies have developed with respect to the value of this technique. This article will examine the role of Intentional replantation in dentistry and review indications and contraindications, treatment rationale, technique, and factors affecting success.There has been controvercies on the Successfulness of the technique. A comprehensive review has been conducted with report of a case carried out on this method.

The Intentional crimes against physical integrity are among the crimes in which the private aspect is very colorful due to the direct harm to individuals. Therefore, the retribution as the main penalty like the blood money is given to victim or his/her parents. This issue has led some to ignore the separate right to punishment for society. In Islamic jurisprudence and consequently in the regulations of Iran, the discussion of the legitimacy of the ta'zir of the perpetrator in in case of retribution, the subject of the social aspect of crime, had become one of the challenging issues after the victory of the Islamic Revolution. In the Islamic Penal code adopted in 2013, by enacting general provisions in Article 447, has tried to regulate the ta'zir of the crimes in a disciplined manner, although the amount of ta'zir, especially in the case of physical crimes less than murder, is very ambiguous. In other Islamic countries, too, the social aspect of the crime has been recognized. In the present article, with a descriptive analytical method, this issue has been studied in a comparative manner according to the jurisprudential principles which indicated the strength of the position of identifying the social aspect of Intentional crimes in perspective of jurisprudential documents. In addition in our legal system, the punishment of social aspect in murder according to Article 612 of the Book of Ta'zirat, and Physical crimes less than murder, if they are examples specified in Article 614 or committed with a weapon, will be determined in accordance with this article, otherwise alternative punishments of imprisonment will be imposed.

Brandom’s main claim is that the representational dimension of language, including Intentional directedness, emerges and also reflects the social dimension of language. Brandom argues that his analysis of the expressive function of “about” in de re ascriptions confirms his main claim. Deflationary interpretation of Brandom’s analysis denies that “about” ascribes a property to mental s tates. In the present article, firs t, by explaining Brandom’s inferentialis t analysis of singular terms and notion of object, we show how objects via inferential triangulation can be given to us. Then, we elucidate the connection between Brandom’s analysis of objectivity and his analysis of Intentional directedness as the reflection of social dimension. Relying on this elucidation, we explain Brandom’s claim that “about” plays a role similar to Kant’s categories. Brandom’s view on Intentional directedness is a radical switch of view which challenges the whole tradition of philosophical theory seeking to explain Intentionality as a property of mental s tates.

Introduction: Hydrogen peroxide poisoning can cause death. The chemical reactions in the body will produce complications, such as stroke, perforation of the gut, and embolism. These complications are most likely seen with high concentrations. Case Presentation: The patient was a 55-year-old female, who tried to commit suicide by ingestion of approximately 150 cc of hydrogen peroxide. She was brought to the emergency room for medical treatment. During the physical examination, the patient had air in the neck and mediastinum, which is a strong indication of acute mediastinitis. The patient was treated with esophagectomy and feeding jejunostomy. The pathology reported first degree burns of the esophagus without perforation. The patient underwent reconstructive surgery and treatment for eight weeks, yet she died during surgery as a result of low ejection fraction (EF). Conclusions: In this case, the patient Intentionally ingested a low concentration (15%) of hydrogen peroxide and as a result experienced first degree burns in the esophagus. The patient did not require surgery for treatment. The presence of white mucus and air around the esophagus and stomach was thought to be indicative of acute mediastinitis and mistakenly exposed the patient to major surgery.

Background and Aim: Trial in Intentional and unIntentional crimes is one of the most multifaceted issues in criminal law and Forensic medicine, as well as the involvement of causes that ascend from the characteristics of the culprit and within the committer and as grounds. They reproduce this complexity in terms of their attendance or absence of interconnection and how they disturb it. This article deals with the trials facing criminal law and forensic medicine in relation to the grounds intricate in the crime and in view of the importance and obligation of the issue in terms of disagreement about the role of the grounds in the judicial process. This article aims to provide an appropriate prototypical of how the context plays the role while investigating some of the sentiments related to the context. Materials and Methods: This descriptive-analytical article has been equipped and compiled by means of the documentary method and using the note tool. Results: The findings designate that,The underlying cause with the proficient opinion of forensic physicians along with the foreman or other causes can be elevated by playing a creative role in achieving the criminal consequence, but in most cases the fundamental cause is hurrying, accelerating or escalating the effect of the foreman's act or other It is a cause and in such cases the submission of the title to the existing setting and the fortitude of the share as a result is not adequate, but it can be considered along with the steward or other causes for it, although some legal systems By completely vacating the role of the underlying cause, they do not subsidize to this cause under any circumstances. Ethical considerations: From the commencement to the end of the article has been equipped and compiled with adherence to the values of honesty and reliability. Conclusion: In view of the silence of the law in the Iranian legal system and on the other hand the lack of obvious jurisprudential rules on the role and consequence of the underlying causes, in exploratory the judicial procedure of Iranian criminal courts, on the one hand we see divergence of opinions that some courts, Have not accepted the effect of the underlying cause and others, based on forensic concepts, have accepted that in many cases the jurisprudence has accepted the role and share for the underlying cause which only had an aggravating or accelerating role in the crime. Have diverged from the path of fairness and justice and the adherence of the principle of fairness of persons, and it is necessary for the legislator to enact the essential laws and take advantage of medical advances in this regard, while culmination the fragmentation of judicial technique, the rule of thin skull Which is putative in most legal systems, in order to protect the scrawnier and more justified cause.

Background and Aim: Previously, only the behavior and the amount of harm was considered and an element called fault and its extent was not considered. Gradually, this way of thinking changed and an element called mental element was added to the elements that constitute crimes. Although the change of approach and attention to the psychological element caused the division of crimes into Intentional and unIntentional and the separation of responsible persons from others, but it has always been accompanied by a logical objection and that is that there is no difference between Intentional and unIntentional. The mental element is an act committed either Intentionally or unIntentionally, while the intensity and extent of Intentionality or unIntentionality by different people are not the same and to the same degree. The purpose of writing this article is to express different grading for Intentional and unIntentional, which has been implemented by modeling fuzzy logic in premeditated, quasi-Intentional homicides and pure error.Method: This research has been done in terms of applied purpose and descriptive-analytical method.Results: According to Article 289 of the Islamic Penal Code of 1392, crimes are divided into Intentional, quasi-Intentional and pure error based on the mental element and the only criterion for punishment is whether it is Intentional or unIntentional and how much is Intentional or how much It is a quasi-Intentional or an error that is ignored, indicating that Aristotelian logic is 0 or 1. In contrast to Aristotelian logic, there is fuzzy logic, according to which the degree of blame is considered on a basis of 0 to 1, which was used as research findings in various crimes.